I tried Shiny New Thing against a wide variety of people. It seemed to work in situations where my opponent was prepared to throw shots that involved their arm being fully-extended against me - either full-length shots or angled shots with the arm fully extended. This is somewhat ironic, because that is exactly what Shiny New Thing does.
It seems to work badly against people who do mid-blade opposition and winding against me. This is unsurprising, partly because that was Sorcha's first response when I showed her Shiny New Thing. Mid-blade winding usually requires a stance with the blade in front of the body in a way that allows me to gain opposition or play feinting games.
This is fortunate. I have been having trouble with people who don't give blade opposition. Shiny New Thing isn't perfect, but it is still educational. I need to better characterize the stances and positioning in which it works, and see if I can turn it from a useful flowchart into some principles which I can then apply to my overall fencing game.
I also tried to explain Shiny New Thing to a group of fencers. As usual, I was unable to effectively communicate why I was trying out the thing I am trying. Oh well.
*****
Shiny New Thing has been another example of how I learn by mining "New Tricks" for overarching principles. As per my standard way of learning:
- I find a New Trick
- I use New Trick over and over again to figure out where it does and doesn't work
- Try to characterize when New Trick does and does not work
- Eventually learn to differentiate situations in which New Trick does and does not work.
- The differentiation between these situations is a new principle of fencing.
I'm currently sitting at stage 2 of this learning curve, trying to transition into stage 3.
*****
Aside from new-trick-related things, practice was very good. Much fighting, and I wasn't dead tired after it. Now, if only the drive back hadn't been so very, very snowy.
I have some thoughts as to why you might be running into difficulties when you're trying to explain what you're doing. A lot of it comes down to either having a very different development process than other people, approaching it differently, and in some few cases running up against data mismatches because of manual comparisons that fly in the face of how other people understand/interpret/utilize the material.
ReplyDeleteI think this would work better as a beerchat than in text, but that's 100% a thing I'm willing to do!
This would be a beerchat that I would deeply appreciate. I had an inkling that some of these things might be the reason behind my lack of being able to transfer knowledge effectively.
Delete"manual comparisons that fly in the face of how other people understand/interpret/utilize the material" is an excellent turn of phrase. I might need to steal part of that to rename this blog again.
Our conversation about New Thing was interrupted, but I am always happy to contribute. Often as Person New Thing Fails Against. :D
DeleteOne of many reasons I enjoy fencing you! Because failure is more educational than success.
Delete