I fought pickups against several people. The purpose of my pickups was to see how this different way of thinking about opposition is applicable. A note: I use the term "Sad Zone" in this post. This is the ideal place to push against someone's sword for opposition. I will not go into how I determine the location of the Sad Zone here.
As a note, I was literally bouncing this practice, that's how happy and excited I was for the pickups portion. As the tournament happened, I slipped into tournament headspace. That was good! It means I am able to switch between headspaces as needed.
My first set of pickups was against a buckler fighter. I ended up getting touched when he was able to isolate my sword and grab on to its location with his sword and/or buckler. I ended up touching him with a cutting thrust over his arm, directly through the Sad Zone of his sword. Additionally, I was able to perform several single-tempo passing-step dagger-pushes into the Sad Zone of his sword, when I moved my sword to the far outside line. I wasn't able to capitalize on it like I thought I should have been. Perhaps I should have gone for arm cuts or leg thrusts during the tempi in which I completely owned his sword.
My next set was against the Doctor. He was not feeling super well, and even so I think that the fights went more than 50% in his favor. He uses two long swords, and using my knowledge of principles in New Sword Magic, I was able to determine that the Sad Zone of his swords was much farther back than I had previously expected. As such, I was able to perform many cuts and pushes which actually gained good opposition against his swords. I feel like there is quite a bit of room for me to improve my execution of the principles of New Sword Magic, so that's pretty exciting to me.
After that, I fought another buckler fighter. She used her buckler more offensively and kept her sword much lower. I had trouble applying my principles of opposition to her, because she kept doing all these really good things that I didn't expect. Eventually I settled on a tactic of getting into Fabris Plate 60 stance and letting my dagger drift around defensively, while alternating high/low and high/high fakes. I could probably have done that same thing I mention above for the other buckler fighter, to her. Oh well, live and learn.
My last set of fights was against someone fighting with a dagger and a shorter sword. She was fighting primarily in a Fabris stance that I do not think is Good and True. I have seen this stance several times, and I have never liked it. Her stance exposed the Sad Zone of her sword, and as such I was able to push through that area using Compound Thrusts. That is to say, a particular type of line-change, combined with a particular type of cutting thrust.
There was also a tournament! I fought in it and won it.
Several people did good things. I got booped in the nose because I did not close the line far enough, which is apparently a danger when performing a cutting thrust from the inside line using New Sword Magic. I need to work really hard on it before K&Q Rapier, in order to not shoot myself in the foot with New Sword Magic by doing something like that.
The other pass I lost was one in which I had cane, and he had buckler. There was a bunch of messiness, and I got legged. Then there was more messiness, and we both thought that we might have hit with thrusts, so we re-fought from the point at which I was legged. Eventually he took the pass and I don't even remember how. I think it was a thrust from his left side, using his right hand? Not sure.
But yeah. It was a good practice. I learned a lot.
Can you explain why you do not feel that Fabris' guard in Plate 60 is not good, whereas you personally use and favor guards that extend the sword even further, and without the support of the dagger by the debole?
ReplyDeleteI think you and I have different interpretations of plate 60, given that I have used a stance that I have claimed to be plate 60 for quite some time. Yours is likely correct, given that I don't actually have the text to read from.
DeleteI feel like you are exposing the weak of the flat of your sword to a lunge with opposition, in that guard. I think that in order to make that stance work, your sword-elbow needs to be out more so that pushing your sword sideways across your body gains me less.
I think that your dagger needs to be exactly at the division between "the sad zone" and strong of your blade, rather than near the tip. "The sad zone" being the part of the blade that is clumsy in disengaging but not strong enough to parry.
This allows you to sweep my sword off of your sword with a passing step if I attempt to do opposition. Or, if I try to lunge through the strong of your sword, you extend through my sword with a reinforce from your dagger.
I believe that the division between weak and strong is much farther forward in the images in Fabris's manual than it is in either of our swords, if that stance is supposed to work how I think it is.